Introduction
Earning widespread recognition even among people outside of tech, C++ has been a cornerstone of the programming world for over 36 years. Its presence has made it a go-to language for developers. Rust launched in the early 2010s and has become a potential competitor. It isn’t as widely known as C++ but Rust’s popularity is steadily growing.
The rise of Rust has sparked debate among developers. Given some shared characteristics, Rust and C++ are frequently compared. We’ll go over the strengths of both languages in this article, with a focus on their key features and performance capabilities, to better understand how Rust stacks up against C++.
Overview of Rust and C++
Let’s take a second to check out why both of these languages have gained such widespread use from software developers and companies before diving into the strengths of Rust and C++.
Rust, a relatively recent addition to the programming world, has been named the most desired programming language several times in Stack Overflow’s annual developer survey. On the other hand, C++, despite its age, continues to maintain a strong and loyal base. C++ quickly became popular due to its adaptability, low-level control, and efficiency when first introduced as a commercial product in 1985.
Against newer languages like Rust and Golang, C++ still hold up extremely well. Its ranked fourth most popular programming language according to the 2022 TIOBE index. C++ has seen big developments, with regular updates that enhance functionality. C++ 20, released in 2020, brought in features like modules and concepts, making it more efficient and secure.
C++ has proven an ability to evolve over time, but Rust emerged as a notable competitor. Rust, which began under Mozilla’s sponsorship in 2009 and officially launched in 2015, quickly gained attention for its high performance and efficiency, qualities it shares with C++.
However, where Rust truly excels is in memory safety. Specifically designed to address common issues in traditional programming languages, Rust ensures memory safety by eliminating risks like dangling pointers and buffer overflows. Its emphasis on safety and reliability has contributed to its consistent ranking as the most desired language, and its popularity shows no signs of fading anytime soon.
Importance of Choosing the Right Language
A challenging part of the development process is choosing a programming language. Should you use a more modern, high-performance option like Rust, known for exceptional security features? Or should you stick with C++, known for scalability, extensive libraries, and backward compatibility?
There’s no universal answer when it comes to selecting the ideal language for your business. But it’s a decision that carries significant weight—making the wrong choice can lead to setbacks like delayed timelines, higher costs, integration difficulties, performance limitations, and potential security issues.
To avoid these pitfalls carefully assess your project’s specific needs. Below are some key factors to consider when deciding which programming language best suits your goals:
- Product Requirements: The product demands should guide your choice. Each language has unique features that lend themselves to different types of projects. For example, C++ is a strong candidate for desktop applications, while Rust shines in systems programming and web assembly.
- Availability of Talent: The talent pool for some languages can be limited, making finding skilled developers challenging and expensive. This can slow down your development process and drive labor costs.
- Scalability: Startups often aim for rapid growth, so selecting a language known for its scalability is essential. Both C++ and Rust are well-equipped to handle increased data loads and traffic as your business expands.
- Community and Resources: A language with a smaller community might offer fewer frameworks, libraries, and tools, which could slow down development. However, these tight-knit communities often offer more specialized support and knowledge that could prove beneficial.
- Long-Term Maintenance: Opting for a language with limited long-term support or few available developers could increase maintenance costs over time. As your startup grows, maintaining and updating software may become more difficult if the language lacks strong support.
Consulting with experienced developers or seeking advice from software recruitment experts can also help you make a well-informed decision for your startup’s future.
Language Background
Rust
History and Development
Rust is open-source systems-level programming language made by Graydon Hoare, a former Mozilla engineer. What started as a personal side project was driven by Hoare’s goal to create a language that could resolve the memory management and allocation issues often encountered in C and C++. His vision grew in popularity , leading Mozilla to sponsor the project in 2009. Rust was available as an open-source language in 2010 and reached a big milestone in 2015, when version 1.0 was released, declaring it as “stable and mature.”
Rust has formed a strong following with developers. It also caught the attention of big tech companies like Microsoft, Alphabet, and Dropbox.
Rust is most commonly utilized in several key areas, including:
- Building performance-critical backend systems
- Developing operating systems and low-level components (e.g., Android and Google Chrome)
- Server-side web applications
- Blockchain infrastructure and smart contract development
- Command-line interface (CLI) tools
- Embedded systems and IoT projects
Core Features
Rust is classified as a low-level or systems programming language, meaning it operates close to hardware and can directly interact with it, unlike higher-level languages like JavaScript, which rely on abstraction layers like operating systems or web browsers.
Other systems programming languages, such as C, C++, Go, and Assembly, are often used for coding low-level components like operating systems, device drivers, system utilities, game engines, virtual reality (VR) simulations, and Internet of Things (IoT) devices.
What sets system languages apart is their ability to access hardware resources directly, allowing developers to control these resources for performance-critical tasks with greater precision. Rust, being the most modern system language widely used today, was designed in the internet era to address the shortcomings of older languages like C and C++.
The first stable version came out in 2015, created to overcome memory management issues that became apparent as software systems integrated with hardware grew in complexity. A big aspect of design that makes it different from other languages is the approach to memory management. Unlike older languages, Rust doesn’t rely on garbage collection.
This is largely due to its being a strongly-typed language, which enforces strict rules about how data types are used. This strong typing system requires developers to follow precise guidelines when writing code, significantly reducing the margin for error.
C++
History and Development
In 1979 at AT&T Bell Labs, C++ was made by Danish computer scientist Bjarne Stroustrup. Its origins can be traced back to Stroustrup’s work analyzing the UNIX kernel to explore how it could be distributed across a network.
During his time as a Ph.D. student at Cambridge University’s Computing Laboratory, Stroustrup was particularly drawn to the organizational and concurrency features of the Simula programming language, which he used to build a simulator. However, he found that Simula’s implementation didn’t scale well, leading him to eventually rewrite the simulator in BCPL.
When Stroustrup later joined AT&T Bell Labs, he sought to enhance the C programming language by incorporating the features he had admired in Simula.
To do this, he began creating a preprocessor called Cpre, which allowed C programs to use Simula-like classes and convert them into standard C code that could be compiled with existing tools. This project initially went by the name “C with Classes.”
As the language evolved, it needed a more fitting name. For a while, it was referred to as C84, but that name was deemed confusing and unappealing. Eventually, computer scientist Rick Mascitti proposed the name C++, symbolizing that it was an advancement of C.
As new features were continually added to the language, the Cpre preprocessor became inadequate. Stroustrup and his team developed a more advanced compiler called Cfront.
While Cfront still produced C code for convenience, it acted as a full compiler, performing syntax and semantic checks and creating an internal representation of the program, with a separate symbol table for each scope.
Core Features
C++ is a programming language that builds on the C language by introducing object-oriented programming concepts. It is an imperative and compiled language, known for key features, such as:
- Object Oriented Programming
- Platform Independence (but not executable independence)
- Simplicity
- High-Level Functionality
- Popularity
- Case Sensitivity
- Compiler Dependency
- Dynamic Memory Allocation
- Advanced Memory Management
- Support for Multi-threading
One of the defining aspects of C++ is its object-oriented nature, distinguishing it from C, which follows a procedural programming paradigm. With C++, developers can create and manage objects during programming, as well as design blueprints (classes) to generate objects. These concepts are central to OOP in C++, which include:
- Classes
- Objects
- Encapsulation
- Polymorphism
- Inheritance
- Abstraction
C++ programs aren’t platform independent at the executable level, but the source code is machine independent. The same C++ code can be compiled and executed on different operating systems like Linux, Windows, and macOS. C++ is straightforward since it allows logical structuring of code, robust library support, and a wide range of data types.
Rust vs. C++ Performance Comparison
One major reason behind Rust’s growing popularity is its performance. The ownership and borrowing model is designed to prevent runtime issues like data races and dangling pointers, which contributes to its speed.
Rust excels in performance by combining zero-cost abstractions, fine-grained low-level control, and an optimizing compiler. On the other hand, C++ is also recognized for its speed and memory management.
While Rust holds an edge in terms of memory safety, thanks to its automated handling of ownership, C++ provides developers with more flexibility through manual memory management, appealing to those who prefer a greater degree of control. Like Rust, C++ delivers high performance by offering low-level control and zero-cost abstractions.
So, which language is superior when it comes to performance? Both Rust and C++ are strong contenders in this regard, making it difficult to declare a clear winner. The decision ultimately depends on the specific trade-offs and requirements that startups and software developers need to consider when choosing the right language for their projects.
Rust vs. C++ Safety and Security Comparison
Rust’s standout feature is strong focus on memory safety. Ownership and borrowing systems help maintain high performance while reducing the risk of crashes, memory leaks, and vulnerabilities, enhancing security.
For safer abstractions to prevent data races and concurrency-related issues, Rust uses concurrency mechanisms. Developers avoid the limitations and complexities of garbage collection algorithms since Rust doesn’t depend on a garbage collector. C++ offers greater low level control and flexibility, which can be an asset and a challenge.
While C++ lets developers manually manage memory, this increases the responsibility to avoid mistakes that lead to security vulnerabilities. C++ has an array of features that can be used to improve security, but it requires careful programming to prevent risks.
While both Rust and C++ can create highly secure systems, Rust leads in this regard. Rust’s built-in memory safety mechanisms provide an advantage, whereas C++ demands more specialized expertise to manage memory effectively, making it more susceptible to security challenges.
Rust vs. C++ Learning Curve Comparison
One challenge many developers face when first learning Rust is its relatively steep learning curve. While the language offers impressive performance and security advantages, understanding its ownership and borrowing system can be tricky, especially for those not used to managing memory without a garbage collector.
Other aspects of Rust that can be difficult to master include its enum-based error handling and its strict, unforgiving compiler.
On the flip side, while C++ can also be tough for beginners in programming, developers with prior experience might find it more approachable. Devs familiar with languages like C, Java, or Python may find C++ concepts easy to grasp. C++ has its own complexities, like working with pointers, managing memory manually, and understanding object-oriented programming principles.
Rust’s learning curve might feel more daunting if you’re completely new to programming. For those with a background in C-like syntax or general programming knowledge, C++ might be easier to pick up. Though it has its own challenges, C++ is likely the better choice if you’re aiming for a language that’s somewhat simpler to learn.
Rust vs. C++ Ecosystem Comparison
Rust is a newer programming language with a smaller community compared to more established ones, its user base is expanding and becoming increasingly active. Additionally, Rust’s user base leans younger, with about 60% of its developers under the age of 30.
In contrast, C++ boasts a well established and mature ecosystem, especially in domains like game development, embedded systems, and performance critical software. The C++ community is large and resilient, maintaining prominence despite the rise of newer languages like Golang and Rust.
Both Rust and C++ have active and supportive communities, each with distinct qualities. Rust’s community is newer, focused on modern development techniques, and known for being welcoming. C++ has a long-standing, diverse community with extensive experience across various fields. While C++ has a larger following, Rust’s inclusive environment makes this comparison a tie.
Rust vs. C++ Ease of Use Comparison
Rust is considerably easier to use compared to C++. It features a gentler learning curve and is backed by extensive community resources, including libraries, tools, documentation, and other helpful materials to make it accessible to beginners.
C++ is often regarded as a more challenging and complex language, with most users being experienced developers. One reason is dialects in C++ that developers master before they can fully use the language.
Rust ranks among the most loved programming languages in Stack Overflow’s annual Developer Survey, while C++ often finds itself on the list of most dreaded languages. This reflects the shift developers have made away from C++, often gravitating toward Rust as a more user-friendly alternative.
Rust vs. C++ Common Use Cases
Rust Common Use Cases
Rust is a good choice for developing safety-critical systems, including autonomous vehicles, medical devices, and aerospace technologies. Rust can build reliable, high-performance software like operating systems, web servers, and browser engines.
Thanks to speed and efficient memory use, Rust is well suited for developing resource intensive applications like game engines and machine learning models. Rust’s web framework, Rocket, is also gaining popularity with developers for making web applications.
C++ Common Use Cases
C++ is used in system software and game development. Renowned for high performance, C++ is chosen for tasks that need fast execution, like real time systems, 3D graphics rendering, and scientific computations.
C++ is favored choice for building operating systems, compilers, and database management systems. Its object oriented programming features make it well-suited for developing complex software solutions, like large scale enterprise applications and financial systems.
Rust vs. C++ Pros and Cons
Rust Pros and Cons
Advantages of Rust
- Safety: Rust’s borrow checker ensures memory safety without relying on garbage collection, leading to fewer crashes and memory leaks.
- Performance: With performance on par with C and C++, Rust offers precise control over memory and resources.
- Concurrency: Rust’s ownership model simplifies concurrent programming, reducing concurrency-related bugs.
- Modern Tooling: Rust’s package manager and build tool, Cargo, is regarded for user-friendly design and functionality.
- Active Community: Rust boasts a growing and passionate community, contributing to extensive documentation, strong support, and an expanding ecosystem.
Disadvantages of Rust
- Steep Learning Curve: Unique concepts like ownership and lifetimes can be difficult for beginners to master.
- Longer Compile Times: Programs take longer to compile compared to other programming languages.
- Smaller Library Ecosystem: Though expanding, Rust’s library support is still less extensive than that of more established languages like C++ or Python.
- Limited Job Opportunities: While growing, the demand for Rust developers in the job market is currently smaller than for more widely used languages.
C++ Pros and Cons
Advantages of C++
- Portability: C++ compiles and runs on multiple operating systems without needing to be rewritten.
- High Performance: C++ allows developers to optimize applications for performance.
- Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Support: Allows creation of extensible and reusable code through OOP principles, enhancing flexibility.
- Templates: C++ supports templates, enabling developers generic, modular code that improves efficiency.
- Strong Type-Checking: C++ enforces strong type-checking, helping to catch errors during compilation, which makes debugging easier.
Disadvantages of C++
- Steep Learning Curve: C++ can be hard to learn or understand.
- No Garbage Collection: Developers handle memory management manually, leading to more complex code and memory leaks if not done right.
- More Manual Coding: C++ requires more manual coding compared to higher level languages like Java or Python, making development time-intensive.
- Lack of Built-in Features: C++ doesn’t provide built in support for functionalities like database access or threading, requiring developers to rely on external libraries or make custom solutions.
Rust vs. C++: Which Language Should You Choose?
Choosing Rust or C++ boils down to the goals and project needs. Both languages offer performance and security features but differ in other key areas.
Rust, with modern design, shines in memory safety, making it an ideal choice for projects where security is a top priority. Its steep learning curve may present a challenge, particularly for those new to coding.
C++ has a solid and mature ecosystem. It offers flexibility and is easier for developers with previous programming experience to pick up.
Rust and C++ are evenly matched when it comes to performance. Developers must carefully consider priorities and whether they value security or a well established and flexible platform. Both languages have active communities that can provide support.
Your Trusted Partner in Hiring C++ and Rust Developers
If you are ready to start a project with Rust or C++ but aren’t sure where to start, ParallelStaff can help match you up with skill developers and IT specialists. Our team can source out the perfect fit for your next Rust or C++ project. Schedule a call today to get started.
- Concurrency in Java: Essential Guide to Parallel Programming - September 20, 2024
- Rust vs C++: Speed Benchmarks and Performance Analysis - September 20, 2024
- Mastering React Server-Side Rendering: Best Practices and Tips - September 19, 2024
